Dysphagia Grand Rounds 6

One of the major issues with the management of people with dysphagia is the discontent and in many cases, the refusal to adhere to diets composed of thickened fluids. Given that modified diets raise serious clinical management problems with respect to hydration and quality of life; and in the absence of conclusive scientific evidence, numerous facilities have adopted policies allowing patients free access to water. However, this is not a uniform policy with minimal documented evidence to reflect the practice.  

Dysphagia Grand Rounds 6 reviews a randomized-control prospective study that investigates the effects of oral intake of water in people with dysphagia with previously identified aspiration. Read the article below before watching the DGR 6 webinar to maximize your learning experience.  

Article: Effects of oral intake of water in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia
Authors: Martha Karagiannis, Leonie Chivers and Tom Karagiannis
Journal: BMC Geriatrics. 2011;11:9 

Read DGR 6 article herehttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3053239/ 

Download DGR 6 webinar here: http://dysphagiagrandrounds.yondo.com/playlist/dgr-6-june-2017/365

Abstract: 
BACKGROUND
Dysphagia is associated with numerous medical conditions and the major intervention to avoid aspiration in people with dysphagia involves modifying the diet to thickened fluids. This is associated with issues related to patient quality of life and in many cases non-compliance leading to dehydration. Given these concerns and in the absence of conclusive scientific evidence, we designed a study, to further investigate the effects of oral intake of water in people with dysphagia. 

METHODS
We monitored lung related complications, hydration levels and assessed quality of life in two groups of people with dysphagia. The control group was allowed only thickened fluids and patients in the intervention group were allowed access to water for a period of five days. 

RESULTS
Our findings indicate a significantly increased risk in the development lung complications in patients given access to water (6/42; 14.3%) compared to the control group (0/34; no cases). We have further defined patients at highest risk, namely those with degenerative neurologic dysfunction who are immobile or have low mobility. Our results indicate increased total fluid intake in the patients allowed access to water, and the quality of life surveys, albeit from a limited number of patients (24% of patients), suggest the dissatisfaction of patients to diets composed of only thickened fluids. 

CONCLUSIONS
On the basis of these findings we recommend that acute patients, patients with severe neurological dysfunction and immobility should be strongly encouraged to adhere to a thickened fluid or modified solid consistency diet. We recommend that subacute patients with relatively good mobility should have choice after being well-informed of the relative risk.